Congruent with Hua and Wei's (2016) call for "more attention to be paid to the diverse experiences of the individuals and to the strategies they use to deal with the challenges of multilingualism, rather than the overall patterns of language maintenance and language shift" (p.655), and concerning the bilingual turn in the United States context, as evidenced by the adoption of the Seal of Biliteracy in 44 states, this study seeks to investigate how the dynamic relationship between the home and the shifting school environment affect language choice and language policy for individual members in two Hmong-American families in California. The study also aims to contribute to the few family language policy (FLP) studies that consider how dual language immersion (DLI) programs in less commonly taught languages like Hmong shape FLP.
This case study takes an ecological approach to FLP and combines the Douglas Fir Group's (2016) multi-level transdisciplinary framework for second language acquisition that looks at the micro, meso and macro levels with Epstein's (2011) partnership framework, which places the bilingual child within the home, school and community spheres to examine how parents and teachers perceive the relationship between the home and school settings. The combination of frameworks allows the study to trace individual family members' ideologies about bilingualism and their perception of the linguistic partnership between the school and home. Data collection spans ten months and includes interviews with each family member, language portraits, six Zoom recorded activity sessions, student photographs, audio of natural language use, and widely available online data about the DLI program. Data were thematically formulated on an ad hoc basis and analyzed in a recursive process in MAXQDA.
Findings reveal that while both families enrolled their children into the DLI program for heritage language maintenance, they differed in their ideologies about bilingualism concerning literacy, cultural identity and most importantly, in how they viewed whether the school and home were a partnership for linguistic development. Family A viewed the school as the main source of Hmong teaching and stated that without the DLI program, the children would probably not learn Hmong at home. This view was directly reflected in their loose Hmong use at home. Family B viewed the school and home as a partnership where the home supplemented materials being taught at school and their view directly reflected their much more structured Hmong use at home. Altogether both families' accounts highlight how perceptions between DLI programs and the home setting shape FLP.
The study concludes with implications for families considering dual language programs, limitations and a call for more research on how growing bilingual programs are positively or negatively shaping FLP.
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.
Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, Family and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Hua, Z., & Wei, L. (2016). Transnational experience, aspiration and family language policy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(7), 655–666.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1127928